Effect snapshot
| Intervention | Book hotel in city center vs airport suburb to save transit |
| Outcome | Daily transit time to main sights |
| Effect | 30–55 percent relative decrease |
| Confidence | estimate |
| Context | European city tourism, 3–5 night stays, 2022–2025 |
Sources
What changes
Central lodging is commonly associated with 30–55% less daily transit time versus suburban airport hotels for sightseeing trips.
When this tends to work
- Conditions similar to: European city tourism, 3–5 night stays, 2022–2025
- You can measure
Daily transit time to main sightsreliably - The intervention is implemented consistently, not half-measured
When to be careful
- Your audience or product differs materially from the cited context
- Compliance costs or second-order effects outweigh the lift
- Evidence label is estimate—treat wide ranges as planning bands, not promises
Practical takeaway
Use the cited range for prioritization and test design. Verify against your own data before scaling.